The Psychopathology of The Republican
Fear, Domination, The Reptilian Brain and The Non-Goodness of Man
Republicans are different. We must understand them in order to reason with them.
As proud Republicans begin their convention in earnest in Minnesota today it might be a good time to reflect on why a dedicated, patriotic, intelligent adult would choose to be a Republican.
It was a question that always haunted me - until Dennis Prager, super dedicated, super patriotic and unbelievably intelligent Republican - answered it, ironically at the Democratic Convention last week in Denver.
Thank you, Dennis
The answer came at the beginning of a debate I moderated at the Seachange Ideas Forum at The Starz Green Room, a refreshingly deep and cordial debate between Dennis, famed right wing talk show host and Thom Hartmann, my colleague on Air America, one of the most brilliant Progressive minds in the country.
What I learned helps me understand why Republicans are hawks, why they still give George W. Bush a 67% approval rating compared to 29% from the public at large (USA Today/Gallup Poll, August 23, 2008) and why FEAR plays such a vast role in the lives of Republicans. Here is a summary and some analysis.
Basic Belief About Mankind
Underlying everything, Dennis Prager made this bold statement:
"I don't think we're basically good, as it happens/ And that is at least a theoretical political divide . . . It is so obvious to me that people are not basically good that I stand in awe of those who think that people are basically good. You have no evidence for it. . . . Babies are not good . . . What is so good about a baby . . . This notion that we are born good is nonsense . . . We don't start off good. This is fantasy . . . We aren't basically good. People stink as a rule. . . ."
Forever On Guard Against Evil
If Dennis Prager speaks for most or all Republicans and Conservatives, there are huge practical consequences to this life philosophy. As a result of this core, existential belief, Republicans/Conservatives must, above all, always be on guard against evil. Saddam Hussein, Hitler and others. then, are overwhelming evidence that, if not vigilant and fearful, the inherent non-goodness of mankind could erupt, like a bad case of herpes, the virus lying dormant, for ever, in the collective nervous system of mankind.
Dominate (Before You Are Dominated)
Having to be on guard, leads to another core belief, according to famed author Rianne Eisler. She writes, in "The Power of Partnership" that fear leads to a life philosophy and political philosophy of "Domination" rather than the less fear based and more evolved "Partnership" model. Dominate before you are dominated. Fear partnership because, as Dennis explained, individuals are NOT good and, ultimately, can not be trusted, no matter what "agreements" you might negotiate.
The Party of Domination
The Republican Party is a party of domination, not partnership. Dominate the earth - drill, excavate and justify all and any penetration and exercise of control by denying that we humans could even contribute to climate change. Dominate Iraq, because they and their evil leader could someday dominate us. Dominate/attack Iran for the same reason. Fight for your interpretation of The 2nd Amendment because only by having unlimited access to guns can we dominate if and when necessary to suppress those that want to hurt us. Use Lee Atwater tactics and, now, Karl Rove tactics to try to control all branches of government. And, for some who may be even more desperate, use corrupted electronic voting machines and steal elections (on the ground or from The Supreme Court) because it is necessary. All is justified because only "we" are strong enough and understand the true threat of domination that others present. Being dominated is not an option.
It is Republicans, Not Democrats, Who Are Inherently Weak and Need A Strong Protector to Feel Safe
And that leads us to the ultimate irony about Republicans. They are hawks, they are tough, they go nuts about the concept of negotiating (unless there are preconditions that can preserve the domination and superiority) and appeasement . . . precisely because they are afraid. They are afraid and Democrats, those "weak," "Neville Chamberlain loving", "pacifist tree huggers" are actually LESS afraid.
But isn't it always the case. Rush Limbaugh, the bombastic hawk, got a deferment from service in Vietnam. So did Dick Cheney, five times and we all know that Bush, the cowboy who is genuinely afraid of horses, did not choose to go into battle when he had the chance. And just like the many gay Republicans who lashed out against homosexuality over the years, it is this unwillingness to face one's own nature and one's own demons that threatens our country. It is always the case that the bully is more insecure than those he bullies.
Sincere, win-win negotiation and partnership with our enemies and the world is, without question, the least fearful and most effective way to eliminate war and to make our country and the world safer. Yet, the specter of putting down the implements of warfare and adopting a softer approach so ignites the "Oh Daddy, protect me from the bogeyman in the closet" fears of those who are fearful and weak, that they must lash out against it. One would think that Neville Chamberlain was even more evil than Hitler - that is how scary it is for Republicans to not have a strong father running the show to protect them. Dr. George Lakoff brilliantly discusses this in his fine work yet the perception of Republicans as "tough" still remains.
Bush, Thompson, Guiliani, Palin, McCain Speeches
Watch for this recurring theme in all of the Republican speeches and even Joe Lieberman who has adopted the fear of his Republican brothers and sisters. You will hear three major things that come from this underlying philosophy of "mankind is not good", "we must dominate so as not to be dominated".
1. We must "Win" the "War on Terror"
2. Our opponents are "weak." This will be communicated in dozens of different ways.
3. Only we are strong enough to put "Country First" and protect America.
The Republican/Reptilian Brain
But the Republicans have to emphasize and re-emphasize these themes because, in reality, Barack Obama is, tougher than John McCain. Obama's foreign policy is not one that acts out of childish fear but one who is, himself, afraid, can never see this through their overriding screen of fear. The neurology of the human brain, as Dr. Drew Westin and so many neurologists teach us, is such that when you can make people afraid, nothing - not rational thought, nor any other emotion except fear - can be engaged in or experienced. The Hind Brain, popularly called "The Reptilian Brain" responds first and overwhelms the higher Limbic and Neo Cortex parts of the brain. And as long as the "Fight or Flight" response of our Reptilian Brain is triggered, we, as individuals and as a nation, can never escape the fear pattern. Abraham Maslow understood this many years ago with his Hierarchy of Human Needs which says, among other things, that human beings will be frozen in their development as long as they feel they do not have safety or security.
And having Osama bin Laden out there, un-captured, as the eternal bogeyman, is one way to keep that Reptilian brain activated.
A dear friend of mine, a very successful person in the media who is otherwise very socially liberal confirmed this for me. This very savvy man admitted to me that he is "obsessed with" and "petrified by" Osama bin Laden. He even did so publicly on my radio show.
I do not believe that babies or even adults are not good, Dennis. I believe that human beings are, indeed, inherently good and given the right soil, sunlight and water, will blossom into productive and caring members of society, participating and contributing in positive ways. It is the role of that other thing you are afraid of, "Government", nothing more than the collective of our individual assets and desires, to help cultivate that soil and provide the opportunities and the social justice to bring out the inherent good. Promulgate fear and prejudice and we lay the seeds for the weeds of the lesser qualities, of individuals and our country, to take root and grow.
The Republican psychology, or psychopathology, is borne of fear and weakness and, thus promulgates both. As one of our strongest Presidents, a Democrat who won a real war with a legitimate enemy said, "The only thing to fear is fear itself." Well, today, in light of the continual "boogeymaning" of the country, we might paraphrase President Roosevelt. "The only thing to fear is fear itself and those who stoke it and those who profit from it. In other words, the only thing to fear is . . . those who reject the basic goodness of man, those who huddle in St. Paul this week and many of those who call themselves "Republicans".
Our response to this dangerous psychopathology that will be on full display this week in St. Paul is, above all, to understand the dysfunction, not to attack it. Rejecting the dysfunction of another often causes one to retreat further into it, to justify with even more force that which is essential to their current identity. As a communication strategist who greatly appreciates the importance of human psychology I suggest that the communication of the Democratic cause and the future of our country depend on allowing those who are stuck in fear of mankind and stuck in the Reptilian part of their brain to know that we, at least, acknowledge that fear and their reality. No communication is ever possible without the sharing of some commonality, to be, in at least some small way, on the same "wavelength." So, while the dangerous Neo-con, domination based ideas, ironically, threaten the very safety of our great country, we must step back and, as if we were coaxing a scared third grader to get out of bed and open the closet door, treat our fellow Republican citizens with love and respect, listen to them and, gently, help them feel safe in ways that do not always involve guns or bombs.
- FILED UNDER: Host Posts
- September 2, 2008








Our inner reptiles
Great post, Richard.
Since we all have inner reptiles, it comes down to what we feed. What a rush fear and anger are! So addictive!
There are some who listen to their higher angels and some who listen to their lower nature, and some who can go either way. If those who appeal to the lower nature have control of the dialogue, the susceptible will go that way.
That's why alternative voices need to speak up and out even if they get smacked down by the aggressive. I wouldn't waste too much time talking to the hard core, but spend plenty who haven't lost contact with their souls.
Thanks so much to Air America and you for providing an outlet for a kinder, gentler perspective.
- Email this page
By ConsideredSeptember 2, 2008 - 6:14pmRepublican Appeasement of Hitler
A lot of people forget that Neville Chamberlain was a member of Britain's Conservative Party, not its liberal Labor Party, and that the majority of Hitler appeasers in the the U.S. Congress were Republicans. While American conservatives try to pretend that they were always opposed to Hitler, this is not the case. Back in the 1930s, many American conservatives were closet Hitler supporters, including Prescott Bush, father of George Bush, who was busy making banking deals with the Nazis. American conservatives have always been about appeasing fascists. It was only during the Cold War, when Communism became the enemy, that America's conservatives jumped into their anti-appeasement mode.
- Email this page
By mtracy9September 2, 2008 - 7:07pmThis is brilliant!
I think it is the most intelligent explanation of the Republican culture of fear that has ever been written. When I do post something on my blog that is about politics I am astonished at the fear based posts that the conservatives cook up and write. They are just so incredibly fearful (full of fear). One woman just can't make a post without telling me that I am "one angry woman". I've chided her repeatedly that I think that is a compliment; she refuses to understand.
A thousand thanks to you for writing and posthing this. It is brilliant. And mtracy9: Your comment is exactly right. The Nazi's appeared to have perfected the "war so we can steal" concept and they rushed to embrace it. All hoping that it would be swept under the rug.
We must be grateful to live in the www era when this type of rewriting of history is harder and harder for the conservatives to do. I mean, look at Ms. Palin? Did she think that her true story just wasn't going to be discovered????
- Email this page
By DKB4444September 2, 2008 - 8:16pmConverting conservatives
Best of luck with holding out for conversions. Fear, like booze and drugs, is addictive. It has a wonderful kick to it, and no addict can be coaxed into sobriety (consciousness) unless they have a desire for it. I've never met a neo-con who wants to exist as anything other than a fear-filled creature, because, man, all those guns and bombs and bombast are a rush!
- Email this page
By DavidMichaelSmithSeptember 3, 2008 - 11:22amRepublican attacks self, claims victory, blames Dems
This just in:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Cd-BDFeF14
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed." Dwight Eisenhower
- Email this page
By MichtouSeptember 3, 2008 - 10:46pmGot it, SuckUp by posting stupid pet tricks YouTubes. BRILLIANT!
Or, perhaps not.
- Email this page
By Sonny WortzikSeptember 6, 2008 - 5:34amSing sing
You are, apparently, incapable of understanding a metaphor.
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed." Dwight Eisenhower
- Email this page
By MichtouSeptember 6, 2008 - 10:25amIt˚s not a trick photography acuity test per the WTC7 implosion?
FYI:
Cocktease Woodward now says DoD has a NEW SECRET WEAPON that targets evildoers, which is a game changer on par with "role of the tank, and the airplane" during the early 20th century.
- Email this page
By Sonny WortzikSeptember 7, 2008 - 7:38pm.
.
- Email this page
By MichtouSeptember 7, 2008 - 7:54pmWar is safe, peace is risky
There's an example of the fear mindset from tonight. During tonight's Republican convention, Mike Huckabee said, "Maybe the most dangerous threat of an Obama presidency is that he would continue to give madmen the benefit of the doubt. If he's wrong just once, we will pay a heavy price." It's hardly unique observation that Americans assume all leaders of hostile nations are madmen. Either that or they're all Hitler, which are synonyms in American politics. The interesting part of Huckabee's statement however is that talking to "madmen" is risky. War, apparently, is not risky. In the conservative mind, war is safe, but peace is risky. Doing something nasty to someone else is safe. To do otherwise is to take the risk of someone doing something nasty to you.
http://www.france24.com/en/20080904-palin-obama-usa-vote-vice-president-...
The Raven's Blog: May the Better Bird Win
http://www.ravensblog.net
- Email this page
By ericfSeptember 4, 2008 - 12:20amExcellent!
Probably the most comprehensive, concise and accurate analysis of the republican/conservative mind set I've ever read; this is a keeper, thanks.
- Email this page
By Freedom FriesSeptember 5, 2008 - 2:49pmForbes has counter-smear political playbook for "D"ems, really?
- Email this page
By Sonny WortzikSeptember 6, 2008 - 4:59am.
.
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed." Dwight Eisenhower
- Email this page
By MichtouSeptember 6, 2008 - 12:03pmThoughts from a former Republican
I agree with the idea that republicans prefer clear black/white and good/evil lines that are easy to delineate and rally around.
This is the most evil and unfortunate side of Rove/Bush/Cheney/McCain strategy. Many republicans are extremely loyal and will lose out personally for the good of the country. They are taking advantage of this loyalty and goodness of many decent people and turning it against the interest of these same people.
We need to speak to republicans in a way about the issues that they understand and care about. I think I was the most effective converting borderline republicans by talking about how stupid Bush/McCain strategy is for furthering the republican agenda ('macho-beat-the-hell-out-of-them speak' may be optional).
Iraq - Bush is a stupid hawk. Instead of going after the country developing nuclear weapons, he went after their neighbor. So we wasted 4000 lives, 20000 maimed, $1-2 trillion for nothing except help our enemies. Iran is sure happy now and laughing at our stupidity all the way to the bank. They probably want Bush to be president for 4 more years. If we are going to be hawks, be smart, not stupid like Bush/McCain.
Energy plan - The Obama plan to raise taxes on oil - will hurt Iran and Russia by lowering the price of oil Thus, by cutting down our enemies's resources, they have less money to develop military capabilities. The McCain plan for tax holiday is stupid and self-defeating. It violates simple supply-demand free-trade economics. Lower taxes -> lower gasoline price -> increased demand -> higher price and more money for Iran and Russia. It is self-defeating.
On the other hand, Obama energy plan will increase tax -> high price -> reduced demand -> lower price long term and less money for Iran and Russia. Furthermore, we should keep the pressure on Iran and Riussia by keeping the price of gasoline high. If the price of oil comes down, we should even further increase the tax on oil, thus keeping demand low and keeping valuable monies from reaching Iran and Russia.
Taxes and Energy Plan - of course the working class will not be affected by the energy plan. We will send of stimulus checks to the taxpayers that will cancel out the effect of the higher gasoline tax. Furthermore, the checks will go out now so that it will provide a stimulus for the economy.
- Email this page
By ancientchinesesecretSeptember 6, 2008 - 8:51pmRadio
What happened to Ron Reagan's Seattle radio show?
- Email this page
By NickyRoseSeptember 8, 2008 - 8:14pmI don't think "conservatives"
want to get rid of government. They want government to work for them, Isn't that what the Fannie and Freddie bailouts are all about? The abolish government message is a vote getting con.
- Email this page
By NickyRoseSeptember 8, 2008 - 8:34pmRR?
Damn! My AAR stream cut off and I was unable to hear what Ron Reagan had to say about what his father would think of the current Republicans.
- Email this page
By NickyRoseSeptember 8, 2008 - 8:42pmRon Reagan:
In an April 2003 interview, Reagan said, "The Bush people have no right to speak for my father, particularly because of the position he's in now. Yes, some of the current policies are an extension of the '80s. But the overall thrust of this administration is not my father's – these people are overly reaching, overly aggressive, overly secretive, and just plain corrupt. I don't trust these people."
- Email this page
By NickyRoseSeptember 8, 2008 - 8:40pm