"Hey, Mike. Mike, I didn't interrupt you." --Mike Gallagher

Unless, of course, giggling like two toe-tapping Republicans in a mens restroom stall overtop of Pap as he was trying to speak counts as an interruption.

One wonders what's so funny to this assclown from clownhall.

It can't be that he believes and finds funny his first contention:

"There is not the kind of radioactivity with the Republicans that there is with the Democrats."

Pap addressed this by pointing to the Cheney story. There are also the stories about how McCain doesn't want to be seen together with Bush at the convention. This was apparently part of the reasoning for having Shrub speak on opening night. Their own Number One/Number Two for eight years, and one might not even show while the other is being rushed out the door? And this? Yeah. Nothing radioactive about that.

But I'd point further. To the Target Center in Minneapolis, to be exact.
Ring a bell?
Taking place will be the Ron Paul Counter-Convetion, known as http://rally.campaignforliberty.com/

Mission Statement | Rally For The Republic
“The Campaign for Liberty events planned for August 31 - September 2 will be a celebration of our movement and our supporters, a launch party for the Campaign for Liberty, and a clear call to the Republican Party to return to its roots of limited government, personal responsibility, and protection of our natural rights. The event will run in conjunction with the first two days of the Republican National Convention and will feature top conservative speakers, musicians, and organizations. It will also have an organizational and training function for the Campaign for Liberty and the Freedom Movement.”

Nothing radioactive about that. No animous there.

Where is the Clinton Counter-Convention (or for that matter the Kucinich Counter-Convention)? It doesn't exist. The Clintons will be at the convention, likely to make speeches of unification before fully endorsing Obama. They know they can do no less.
-----
Chucklenuts can't be giggling because he believes and finds funny another of his contentions, that we "must be panicked".

Why panic about being ahead? That seems odd.

McCain is a "known". The guy's been around long enough to be part of the problems he's now complaining like an angry old man about. When he says stuff about the oil crisis being 20-some years in the making while politicians have done nothing. Yeah, he's a politicain for 20-some years who has done nothing while there was an oil crisis coming. He's been around. And while people are just now getting to know the new McCain...

"The John McCain of 2000 wouldn't even consider voting for the John McCain of 2008.". --Howard Dean

...the fact remains: John McCain is a known name.

And with that, he only tops out in polling around 45-46%? While trailing the unknown?

Panic about our unknown candidate being ahead? Against a longtime, well-known name?
Phf.

Now, that IS funny.

Methinks that maybe there be a bit of panic about their well-known being behind to a "troop-hating, flag-burning closet muslim sleeper cell celebrity" (and whatever else they've tossed out) and Gallagher doth project too much.

And then Chucklenuts goes on to whine about Obama having a plane seat with "President" written on it?
If Chucklenuts checks in, I'd remind him of this screenshot:

From this add: http://wonkette.com/401576/uppity-john-mccain-calls-himself-president

Check, Chucklenuts.
____________________
"We can bomb the world to pieces, but we can't bomb it into peace."
"Power to the peaceful..." --Franti